Its highly recommended to all who want to learn about the battles of the French frontier or have an interest in great maps and photos of the campaign. There are many new photos and excellent art-work. Good purchase.
- On this page!
- The Damnation Game!
- The wellbeing of nations : meaning, motive and measurement!
- Theory of weldability of metals and alloys!
- Pharmaceutical process validation.
- Killing for Land in Early California - Indian Blood at Round Valley.
This book is written in military style and prose which, many readers, such as myself, will appreciate. There is a symbol chart of unit designations which is a must for non-military readers. The art work depicting key moments of the battles add a careful yet accurate touch which reminds us that real young men suffered here although it has been still for nearly 75 years. I consider this book a necessary addition for the libraries of students and historians of the Battle for France in Kermit R. One person found this helpful. This is an excellent, concise book on the Maginot Line, its history, why the French built it, its strengths and weaknesses.
The majority of the German attack found a gap in the Maginot Line and raced through it to defeat the French in six weeks. Some attacks were made against the 's fortresses and those battles are told here. It was never an unbroken chain, but a series of forts built at key places to provide mutual fire support. Take out one, and the line begins to unravel. The Germans were most successful when they used the 88 mm Anti Aircraft cannon in direct fire mode against the concrete bunkers and armored cupolas.
The Germans showed the forts could be attacked and defeated with the correct tactics and weapons, sometimes at heavy costs.
Groupthink and France's defeat in the campaign | Emerald Insight
One thing surprised me - there were no cut-aways showing the inside of the major blockhouses or casemates. But the illustrations that are there more than make up for this one missing piece. I'm lucky enough to have seen some of these blockhouses - they size and effort put into them is incredible - almost as much as the battles fought in Even if the Germans had attacked head long into the Maginot Line, they would have still won, but at a much greater price.
Highly recommended reading to fill a gap not addressed elsewhere. I think all students of WW2 will enjoy this very much as well as anyone with an interest in fortifications. Excellent service and product! Great book! Go to Amazon. Back to top. Get to Know Us. English Choose a language for shopping. Audible Download Audio Books. DPReview Digital Photography.
France 1940: The Pitfalls of Historiography
Fast moving tank divisions supported by armoured, mobile infantry swept over opposition, helped by both conventional bombers and deadly Stuka dive-bombers. Alan Shepperd's highly detailed text examines the tactics, organization and equipment of the Allied and German forces, and provides a daily account of the most crucial period of the battle.
Get A Copy. Paperback , 96 pages. More Details Original Title.
- The Effect of Modern Agriculture on Rural Development!
- The Medicalization of Psychotherapy: Practicing under the Influence.
- See a Problem?.
- Complexity and Real Computation!
- One thought!
- Battle of France?
- Intermediate Dutch: A Grammar and Workbook.
- Search the Encyclopedia.
- Poisond: A Pirate RPG.
- Navigation menu!
Osprey Campaign 3. Other Editions 3. Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about France , please sign up. Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Community Reviews. Showing Rating details. More filters. Sort order. Feb 23, Dimitri rated it liked it Shelves: osprey , military-history , world-war-two.
The Osprey campaign series was still trying to find its footing here with regard to the visual material. The main styles of map are already in place: the "professional" style with thin arrows and universal unit symbols imposed on a clear light-green area vs. The latter has matured in the meantime, but the early style retains its charm. Furthermore, the artwork betrays the genesis of Osprey The Osprey campaign series was still trying to find its footing here with regard to the visual material.
See a Problem?
Furthermore, the artwork betrays the genesis of Osprey Publishing as a manufacturer of aircraft-themed cards. It's strictly about vehicles, whereas nowawadays action scenes are commissioned. In this aspect, the series has improved. Conversely, I miss the Wargaming section of the earlier books.
I'm not a practicioner, but these tips conveyed the difficulties on the spot without the benefit of hindsight in ways that the main text sometimes brushed over. Content-wise, it is an adequate summary of the campaign, but looking at the 'Further Reading' section I do wonder how many recent works the author used.
It's all about To Lose a Battle: France Surely not all of its conclusions can have remained uncontested since ' A final positive note: we get a bonus summary of the Dunkirk operation. Osprey doesn't colour outside the lines like that anymore. Jun 01, Hilmi Isa rated it liked it Shelves: perang-dunia Penulisnya, Alan Shepperd ,memfokuskan perbincangannya bermula pada 10 Mei sehingga 4 Jun tahun yang sama dengan peristiwa pemindahan tentera British dan sebahagian besar tentera Perancis di pantai yang diberi nama Dunkirk.
Menggunakan format yang sama seperti Poland ,yang disertakan dengan banyak gambar,peta dan rajah. Cuma,pada pandangan saya,gaya penceritaan Zaloga lebih menarik berbanding Shepperd!
Walaupun Perancis berjuang dengan berani,tetapi,sifat terlalu yakin dengan kekebalan kubu Maginot Line dan kekurangan peralatan ketenteraan yang moden menjadi antara punca kekalahan Perancis di tangan Jerman. Ini ditambahkan lagi dengan ketidakcekapan beberapa komander angkatan tentera Perancis. To overcome this difficulty, the Germans resorted to unconventional means in the assault on the fort. In the early hours of 10 May, DFS gliders landed near the fort and unloaded assault teams that disabled the main gun cupolas with hollow charges.
The Belgians launched considerable counterattacks which were broken up by the Luftwaffe. Similar operations against the bridges in the Netherlands, at Maastricht, failed. All were blown up by the Dutch and only one railway bridge was taken. The Allies had been convinced Belgian resistance would have given them several weeks to prepare a defensive line at the Gembloux Gap.
Gembloux was located between Wavre and Namur, on flat, ideal tank terrain. It was also an unfortified part of the Allied line. They would provide an advanced guarding screen which would stall the Germans and allow sufficient time for the French 1st Army to dig into formidable positions. The resulting Battle of Hannut , which took place on 12—13 May, was the largest tank battle until that date, with about 1, armoured fighting vehicles participating.
They recovered and eventually repaired or rebuilt many of their knocked-out tanks  so German irreparable losses amounted to just 49 tanks 20, 3rd Panzer and 29, 4th Panzer. The French would escape the encirclement and thus render invaluable support to the British Army in Dunkirk two weeks later. The attempt was repelled by the 1st Moroccan Infantry Division, costing 4.
Panzerdivision another 42 tanks, 26 of which were irreparable. This French defensive success was made irrelevant by events further south. The German advance was greatly hampered by the sheer number of troops trying to force their way along the poor road network. Kleist's Panzergruppe had more than 41, vehicles. This made Army Group A very vulnerable to French air attacks, but these did not materialise. The French had tried in vain to stem the flow of the German armour during the Battle of Maastricht and had failed with heavy losses.
In two days, the bomber force had been reduced from to On 11 May, Gamelin had ordered reserve divisions to begin reinforcing the Meuse sector. Because of the danger the Luftwaffe posed, movement over the rail network was limited to night-time, slowing the reinforcement, but the French felt no sense of urgency as they believed the build-up of German divisions would be correspondingly slow.
The French Army did not conduct river crossings unless assured of heavy artillery support. While they were aware that the German tank and infantry formations were strong, they were confident in their strong fortifications and artillery superiority. However, the quality of the fighting men in the area was dubious; their artillery was designed for fighting infantry, and they were short of both antiaircraft and antitank guns. The deeper positions were held by the 55th Infantry Division. This was only a grade "B" reserve division. Furthermore, it had a superiority in artillery to the German units present.
Instead of slowly massing artillery as the French expected, the Germans concentrated most of their air power as they lacked strong artillery forces to smash a hole in a narrow sector of the French lines by carpet bombing and by dive bombing. Some of the forward pillboxes were unaffected and repulsed the crossing attempts of the 2. Panzerdivision s. The morale of the deeper units of the 55th Infantry, however, had been broken by the effect of the air attacks. The French supporting artillery batteries had fled.
The disorder that had begun at Sedan spread down the French lines. It fled, creating a gap in the French defences, before even a single German tank had crossed the river. This "Panic of Bulson" also involved the divisional artillery. The Germans had not attacked their position, and would not do so until 12 hours later, at on 14 May.